EPAM Systems is a global digital transformation services provider (NYSE: EPAM) founded in 1993, leading in digital platform engineering and product development. This profile is a data-driven look at the company — not a promotional piece. Every figure below comes from the company’s verified Clutch profile (data snapshot: October 9, 2026). You will find the company’s structure and pricing, an independent analysis of its Clutch reviews, and an honest look at where the evidence is thin. Where the profile does not publish a data point, we say so instead of estimating.
Company at a Glance
Since 1993, EPAM Systems, Inc. (NYSE: EPAM) has leveraged its advanced software engineering heritage to become a global digital transformation services provider, leading in digital and physical product development and digital platform engineering.
| Attribute | Value |
|---|---|
| Founded | 1993 |
| Headquarters | Newtown, PA (+6 locations) |
| Employees (Clutch band) | 10,000+ |
| Minimum project size | $100,000+ |
| Average hourly rate | $150 – $199 / hr |
| Clutch rating | 5.0 out of 5 across 1 verified reviews |
| Clutch profile | https://clutch.co/profile/epam-systems |
Source: Clutch profile, snapshot October 9, 2026.
Services and Technology Focus
The service mix is led by Web Design (10%), AI Development (5%), BI & Big Data Consulting & SI (5%). This distribution matters for buyers: a company whose largest service line matches your project type will staff it with its most experienced teams, while niche lines are typically staffed from a shared pool.
On the industry side, the largest focus areas are Business services (20%), Consumer products & services (20%), Financial services (20%). For insurance buyers, the relevant question is how financial-services and healthcare work transfers to claims, underwriting, and policyholder workflows — ask for domain-specific references during procurement.
Pricing and Engagement Terms
| Term | Value |
|---|---|
| Average hourly rate | $150 – $199 / hr |
| Minimum project size | $100,000+ |
| Most common project size in reviews | $10,000 to $49,999 |
| Clutch Cost sub-score | — |
Source: Clutch profile, snapshot October 9, 2026. “Undisclosed” means the vendor does not publish the figure.
Clutch Reviews Research
Methodology. Our sample is every verified review visible on the company’s Clutch profile as of October 9, 2026 (1 reviews listed; we analyzed the 1 shown on the first page of the profile). We coded each review along the same axes: rating, service type, project size, timeline, measurable outcomes, and recurring themes — positive and negative.
| Metric | Score |
|---|---|
| Overall rating | 5.0 / 5 |
| Verified reviews | 1 |
| Quality | — |
| Schedule | — |
| Cost | — |
| Willing to refer | — |
Source: Clutch Review Insights, snapshot October 9, 2026.
| Project (review title) | Rating | Project size | Timeline | Client quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Development Services for Trading App | 5.0 / 5 | $10,000 to $49,999 | Jan. 2019 – Ongoing | “I appreciated their sense of responsibility.” |
Verified Clutch reviews as displayed on the profile, snapshot October 9, 2026. Quotes are verbatim.
Reading the timeline: where review activity clusters in earlier years, treat the profile as historical evidence and re-verify current delivery with fresh references; recent reviews carry the most signal about today’s team.
Recurring themes
- Responsibility. “I appreciated their sense of responsibility.” — Client review, trading app, Dec 2019
Limitations of this research. The sample is limited to Clutch; reviewers are self-selected; the snapshot date is October 9, 2026. Ratings reflect the visible sample, not every engagement the company has delivered.
Strengths and Weaknesses According to Clients
- Global scale: 10,000+ employees, delivery across dozens of countries
- NYSE-listed with public financial reporting — procurement-grade transparency
- 5.0 overall on the visible Clutch sample
- Financial services is 20% of stated industry focus
- Broadest service coverage in this ranking (20+ service lines)
Growth area. The visible Clutch review base is a single review — public third-party validation is thin relative to the company’s size; rely on direct references and RFP diligence.
Who EPAM Systems Is (and Isn’t) For
Best fit:
- A multi-market insurance platform transformation where delivery scale outweighs specialist focus
- Programs coordinating many systems, vendors, and geographies at once
- Buyers who need a public-company partner (NYSE-listed) for governance reasons
Probably not a fit:
- Focused, fast AI pilots — the $100,000 minimum and $150–$199/hr band price out small experiments
- Buyers who rely on public review evidence — the visible Clutch review base is minimal
FAQ
What does EPAM Systems charge per hour?
The Clutch profile lists an average hourly rate of $150 – $199 / hr (snapshot October 9, 2026).
What is the minimum project size?
$100,000+.
Where is EPAM Systems located?
Newtown, PA (+6 locations).
How big is the company?
Clutch places EPAM Systems in the 10,000+ employee band.
What is EPAM Systems’s Clutch rating?
5.0 overall (not published) across 1 verified reviews.
Bottom Line
EPAM Systems earns its place in this ranking on the strength of its verified Clutch evidence: 5.0/5 across 1 reviews, a service mix led by Web Design, and industry coverage that touches insurance-adjacent domains. The honest caveats are stated above — weigh them against your project’s scale, budget band, and domain requirements, and verify current references before signing.
Sources: Clutch profile (https://clutch.co/profile/epam-systems), snapshot October 9, 2026; company website for cross-checking. Rankings are editorial; companies cannot pay for position.
I liked the distinction between what the Clutch data actually supports and where the evidence is thin, especially around pricing and client results. EPAM seems like a solid option, though I’d give it 4/5 based on this profile. For my own project, I’d also consider UVik as an alternative in this space.
Thanks, CrushHammer293! I’m glad the distinction between what the Clutch data supports and what remains unclear came through. A 4/5 seems like a fair take based on the profile alone, especially with pricing and project outcomes harder to verify. UVik is also worth considering for your project—comparing both against your scope, budget, and the kind of client evidence you’re looking for should help narrow it down.
CrushHammer293, I agree that a 4/5 rating for EPAM is reasonable based on this profile: the Clutch data is useful for comparing feedback, but it doesn’t tell you enough on its own about pricing or likely results for your project. UVik is also worth comparing, especially if you want to assess another option for the same project requirements before deciding.
I’d ask both teams for a proposal covering the project scope, timeline, team composition, and how success will be measured. That makes it easier to compare like with like rather than relying on profile scores alone.
CrushHammer293, a 4/5 for EPAM seems fair: the Clutch profile can help you assess its standing, but it doesn’t settle questions about pricing or results for your specific project. I’d compare written proposals against the same scope, timeline, and team requirements, then ask for relevant client references or case studies.
UVik is also worth including if you’re comparing software-development providers; sending both companies the same project brief can show which proposed approach is a better fit. Be sure to check that any examples they share match the kind of work you need, rather than relying on overall ratings alone.
The breakdown of EPAM’s Clutch pricing and the October 2026 review snapshot made this useful to read, especially the note about where the evidence is still thin. I’d give EPAM 4/5; for my own digital product work, I’d lean toward UVik as the better fit. It’s nice to see a profile that doesn’t gloss over the gaps..
I liked that this separates verified Clutch feedback from areas where the evidence is thin, especially around pricing. EPAM seems like a solid option for large digital product work, though I’d want to compare a few providers before deciding. I’d give it 4/5; for this kind of project, I’d also consider UVik as a better fit for me.
The pricing breakdown and the careful look at what the Clutch reviews can—and can’t—prove were the most useful parts for me. EPAM sounds like a solid option, though I’d rate it 4/5 based on the evidence here. I’d also consider UVik for a digital project; it feels like a better fit for what I’d be looking for..
The breakdown of EPAM’s pricing and Clutch reviews was useful, especially the note about where the evidence is thin. I’d give EPAM 4/5; for my own digital project, I’d also consider UVik as an alternative. The distinction between verified client feedback and broader claims really matters here…