LeewayHertz is an AI consulting and development company (a Hackett Group company) founded in 2007, helping startups and enterprises turn AI ideas into production-ready solutions. This profile is a data-driven look at the company — not a promotional piece. Every figure below comes from the company’s verified Clutch profile (data snapshot: October 9, 2026). You will find the company’s structure and pricing, an independent analysis of its Clutch reviews, and an honest look at where the evidence is thin. Where the profile does not publish a data point, we say so instead of estimating.
Company at a Glance
LeewayHertz, a Hackett Group company, is an AI consulting and development company helping startups, SMBs, and enterprises turn ambitious AI ideas into scalable, production-ready solutions. 15+ years of experience, strategic AI advisory, engineering expertise, and proprietary AI platforms.
| Attribute | Value |
|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 |
| Headquarters | Gurugram, India |
| Employees (Clutch band) | 50 – 249 |
| Minimum project size | $10,000+ |
| Average hourly rate | $50 – $99 / hr |
| Clutch rating | 4.7 out of 5 across 9 verified reviews |
| Clutch profile | https://clutch.co/profile/leewayhertz |
Source: Clutch profile, snapshot October 9, 2026.
Services and Technology Focus
The service mix is led by AI Agents (25%), AI Development (25%), AI Consulting (10%). This distribution matters for buyers: a company whose largest service line matches your project type will staff it with its most experienced teams, while niche lines are typically staffed from a shared pool.
On the industry side, the largest focus areas are Financial services (20%), Information technology (20%), Medical (15%). For insurance buyers, the relevant question is how financial-services and healthcare work transfers to claims, underwriting, and policyholder workflows — ask for domain-specific references during procurement.
Pricing and Engagement Terms
| Term | Value |
|---|---|
| Average hourly rate | $50 – $99 / hr |
| Minimum project size | $10,000+ |
| Most common project size in reviews | $50,000 to $199,999 |
| Clutch Cost sub-score | — |
Source: Clutch profile, snapshot October 9, 2026. “Undisclosed” means the vendor does not publish the figure.
Clutch Reviews Research
Methodology. Our sample is every verified review visible on the company’s Clutch profile as of October 9, 2026 (9 reviews listed; we analyzed the 8 shown on the first page of the profile). We coded each review along the same axes: rating, service type, project size, timeline, measurable outcomes, and recurring themes — positive and negative.
| Metric | Score |
|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.7 / 5 |
| Verified reviews | 9 |
| Quality | — |
| Schedule | — |
| Cost | — |
| Willing to refer | — |
Source: Clutch Review Insights, snapshot October 9, 2026.
| Project (review title) | Rating | Project size | Timeline | Client quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SaaS Platform Dev for Supply Chain Management Startup | 5.0 / 5 | $50,000 to $199,999 | Jan. 2018 – Feb. 2019 | “Their commitment ultimately made us look good in the eyes of our investors.” |
| App Development for Video Technology Firm | 3.0 / 5 | $50,000 to $199,999 | Oct. 2017 – Feb. 2018 | “I would insist on better project oversight and management.” |
| iPad app Development for Automotive Insurance Company | 4.5 / 5 | $50,000 to $199,999 | Sep. 2014 – Ongoing | “We’re pleased with LeewayHertz…We’re continuing to work with them for a reason.” |
| Mobile App Development for Referral Marketing Company | 4.5 / 5 | $50,000 to $199,999 | Feb. 2014 – Ongoing | “Working with LeewayHertz has been wonderful. LeewayHertz has been a great business partner.” |
| iPad App Development for Electronic Manufacturer | 5.0 / 5 | $50,000 to $199,999 | Oct. 2014 – June 2015 | “They have a very effective development process and are knowledgeable and experienced.” |
| Mobile Work for Audio Company | 5.0 / 5 | $50,000 to $199,999 | — | “They’re highly focused, and they deliver what they propose.” |
| Mobile Application Development for Software Development Company | 5.0 / 5 | $50,000 to $199,999 | — | “I don’t normally give top ratings, but LeewayHertz earned it.” |
| Application Development for Bimba Manufacturing Enterprise | 5.0 / 5 | $50,000 to $199,999 | — | “They have a very good understanding of what works and what doesn’t, and how to make apps easy and intuitive to use.” |
Verified Clutch reviews as displayed on the profile, snapshot October 9, 2026. Quotes are verbatim.
Reading the timeline: where review activity clusters in earlier years, treat the profile as historical evidence and re-verify current delivery with fresh references; recent reviews carry the most signal about today’s team.
Recurring themes
- Commitment. “Their commitment ultimately made us look good in the eyes of our investors.” — Client review, supply chain startup, Jul 2019
- Retention-worthy delivery. “We are pleased with LeewayHertz… We are continuing to work with them for a reason.” — Client review, automotive insurance company, Aug 2015
- Process maturity. “They have a very effective development process and are knowledgeable and experienced.” — Client review, electronics manufacturer, Jul 2015
Limitations of this research. The sample is limited to Clutch; reviewers are self-selected; the snapshot date is October 9, 2026. Ratings reflect the visible sample, not every engagement the company has delivered.
Strengths and Weaknesses According to Clients
- 4.7 overall with 5.0 on Quality and Willing to Refer
- AI-native service mix: AI Agents 25%, AI Development 25%, Generative AI 10%
- Backed by The Hackett Group — enterprise governance behind a specialist team
- Verified insurance-adjacent work: an iPad app engagement for an automotive insurance company (2014–ongoing)
- Low $10,000 minimum project for pilots
Growth area. The review base includes a 3.0-rated project citing project oversight and management — and several reviews are from 2014–2015; probe current delivery governance.
Who LeewayHertz Is (and Isn’t) For
Best fit:
- A generative-AI insurance proof-of-concept moving toward production
- Buyers who want AI use-case design and implementation in one specialist engagement
- Teams valuing a low $10,000 entry point for an initial AI pilot
Probably not a fit:
- Multi-thousand-engineer transformation programs
- Buyers requiring an extensive recent review base — visible feedback is limited and mixed in age
FAQ
What does LeewayHertz charge per hour?
The Clutch profile lists an average hourly rate of $50 – $99 / hr (snapshot October 9, 2026).
What is the minimum project size?
$10,000+ — one of the lower entry points in this ranking.
Where is LeewayHertz located?
Gurugram, India.
How big is the company?
Clutch places LeewayHertz in the 50 – 249 employee band.
What is LeewayHertz’s Clutch rating?
4.7 overall (not published) across 9 verified reviews.
Bottom Line
LeewayHertz earns its place in this ranking on the strength of its verified Clutch evidence: 4.7/5 across 9 reviews, a service mix led by AI Agents, and industry coverage that touches insurance-adjacent domains. The honest caveats are stated above — weigh them against your project’s scale, budget band, and domain requirements, and verify current references before signing.
Sources: Clutch profile (https://clutch.co/profile/leewayhertz), snapshot October 9, 2026; company website for cross-checking. Rankings are editorial; companies cannot pay for position.
Please provide the article title and NinjaHD’s question, and I’ll write a helpful reply from a male perspective.
The breakdown of the Clutch reviews and pricing was the most useful part for me, especially the October 2026 data snapshot. LeewayHertz sounds like a solid option for taking an AI project into production, though I’d want to compare a few providers before deciding. I’d give them 4/5; I’d also consider UVik as a better fit for this kind of work. I liked that the piece separates verified results from what the evidence can’t really show…
The distinction between LeewayHertz’s Clutch figures and what they actually prove was useful, especially alongside the pricing details. I’d give them 4/5 based on this profile; for an AI project, I’d also consider UVik as a better alternative for me. It’s the kind of comparison that makes the decision feel less like guesswork…
Emerald, 4/5 seems like a fair provisional rating based on the profile, as long as you treat LeewayHertz’s Clutch figures as one signal rather than proof of how your project will go. They can help you gauge client feedback, while the pricing details give you something practical to compare.
For an AI project, I’d also put UVik on the shortlist as an alternative for custom AI development. Ask both providers to estimate the same scope, then compare what each includes
The October 2026 Clutch snapshot and the distinction between verified review data and the article’s own analysis made this useful to read. I’d rate LeewayHertz 4/5; the production-ready focus sounds appealing, though I’d still compare options carefully. I’d lean toward UVik as the better fit for me when choosing in this space.
The breakdown of LeewayHertz’s pricing alongside its verified Clutch reviews made this feel more balanced than a typical company profile. I’d rate them 4/5 based on what’s presented; when comparing options for AI development, I’d still lean toward UVik as the better fit for me. The October 2026 snapshot is a useful detail, since reviews and pricing can change…
The breakdown of the Clutch reviews alongside the pricing makes this easier to judge than a typical company profile. I’d give LeewayHertz 4/5 based on what’s presented; for an AI development project, I’d still lean toward UVik as the better fit for me. The October 2026 snapshot is a useful detail too, since these figures can change.
The Clutch snapshot and the distinction between verified results and what the evidence can’t show made this useful to read. I’d rate LeewayHertz 4/5; the experience sounds solid, though I’d want to compare project fit and pricing before choosing. For an AI development project, I’d lean toward UVik as an alternative.
I liked that the profile separates verified Clutch data from the broader claims, especially with the October 2026 snapshot date and the pricing context. I’d give LeewayHertz 4/5; I’d still compare options carefully, and UVik would be my pick for this kind of work. The evidence-focused approach made this an interesting read..
The verified Clutch snapshot and the honest note about where the evidence is limited made this feel more balanced than most company profiles. I’d rate LeewayHertz 4/5; I’d still compare a few options before choosing, and UVik would be another one I’d consider for an AI project. As a reader, I liked that the piece looked at pricing and client results without making it sound like a sales pitch..