Ciklum is a global experience engineering firm founded in 2002, combining product engineering, customer experience, and AI across a 1,000–9,999-person delivery organization. This profile is a data-driven look at the company — not a promotional piece. Every figure below comes from the company’s verified Clutch profile (data snapshot: October 9, 2026). You will find the company’s structure and pricing, an independent analysis of its Clutch reviews, and an honest look at where the evidence is thin. Where the profile does not publish a data point, we say so instead of estimating.
Company at a Glance
Ciklum is a global Experience Engineering firm blending next-generation product engineering, customer experiences, and AI.
| Attribute | Value |
|---|---|
| Founded | 2002 |
| Headquarters | Sofiivska Borshchahivka, Ukraine (+4 locations) |
| Employees (Clutch band) | 1,000 – 9,999 |
| Minimum project size | $25,000+ |
| Average hourly rate | $25 – $49 / hr |
| Clutch rating | 4.8 out of 5 across 7 verified reviews |
| Clutch profile | https://clutch.co/profile/ciklum |
Source: Clutch profile, snapshot October 9, 2026.
Services and Technology Focus
The service mix is led by Custom Software Development (30%), E-Commerce Development (20%), BI & Big Data Consulting & SI (15%). This distribution matters for buyers: a company whose largest service line matches your project type will staff it with its most experienced teams, while niche lines are typically staffed from a shared pool.
On the industry side, the largest focus areas are Retail (25%), Financial services (20%), Hospitality & leisure (20%). For insurance buyers, the relevant question is how financial-services and healthcare work transfers to claims, underwriting, and policyholder workflows — ask for domain-specific references during procurement.
Pricing and Engagement Terms
| Term | Value |
|---|---|
| Average hourly rate | $25 – $49 / hr |
| Minimum project size | $25,000+ |
| Most common project size in reviews | $1,000,000 to $9,999,999 |
| Clutch Cost sub-score | — |
Source: Clutch profile, snapshot October 9, 2026. “Undisclosed” means the vendor does not publish the figure.
Clutch Reviews Research
Methodology. Our sample is every verified review visible on the company’s Clutch profile as of October 9, 2026 (7 reviews listed; we analyzed the 7 shown on the first page of the profile). We coded each review along the same axes: rating, service type, project size, timeline, measurable outcomes, and recurring themes — positive and negative.
| Metric | Score |
|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.8 / 5 |
| Verified reviews | 7 |
| Quality | — |
| Schedule | — |
| Cost | — |
| Willing to refer | — |
Source: Clutch Review Insights, snapshot October 9, 2026.
| Project (review title) | Rating | Project size | Timeline | Client quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software Dev for Homeware Portal | 4.0 / 5 | $10,000 to $49,999 | Mar. – July 2019 | “They were fast and responsive, perfectly meeting our project management expectations.” |
| Dev Outsourcing & Support for Workflow Management Co | 5.0 / 5 | $1,000,000 to $9,999,999 | Jan. 2008 – Ongoing | “Ciklum’s development team has maximized our capacity to produce cutting-edge software.” |
| Staff Augmentation for Cybersecurity Company | 5.0 / 5 | Confidential | July 2011 – Ongoing | “We valued their ability to act as long-term partners instead of merely third-party providers.” |
| Development for English Education Platform | 4.5 / 5 | $200,000 to $999,999 | May 2017 – Ongoing | “Professionalism is their most notable attribute.” |
| Development and QA Resources for Presentation Software | 5.0 / 5 | $200,000 to $999,999 | July 2016 – Ongoing | “The quality of their people is comparable to the resources on our in-house team.” |
| Hardware & Software Product Dev for Newborn Wearable | 5.0 / 5 | $50,000 to $199,999 | June 2016 – Ongoing | “Ciklum has always tried to come up with creative ways for ensuring we achieved our goal.” |
| Development Resources for Enterprise IT Firm | 5.0 / 5 | $1,000,000 to $9,999,999 | Jan. 2011 – Ongoing | “We’ve been able to deliver very good quality results and Ciklum has played a part in that.” |
Verified Clutch reviews as displayed on the profile, snapshot October 9, 2026. Quotes are verbatim.
Reading the timeline: where review activity clusters in earlier years, treat the profile as historical evidence and re-verify current delivery with fresh references; recent reviews carry the most signal about today’s team.
Recurring themes
- Capacity. “Ciklum’s development team has maximized our capacity to produce cutting-edge software.” — Client review, workflow management company, Mar 2019
- Partnership over vending. “We valued their ability to act as long-term partners instead of merely third-party providers.” — Client review, cybersecurity company, Feb 2019
- In-house comparable quality. “The quality of their people is comparable to the resources on our in-house team.” — Client review, presentation software company, Feb 2018
Limitations of this research. The sample is limited to Clutch; reviewers are self-selected; the snapshot date is October 9, 2026. Ratings reflect the visible sample, not every engagement the company has delivered.
Strengths and Weaknesses According to Clients
- 4.8 overall across the visible review base
- Exceptional engagement longevity: ongoing projects since 2008 and 2011 at $1M–$10M scale
- Enterprise-majority client mix (55%)
- Competitive $25–$49/hr rate band for senior dedicated teams
- Financial services is 20% of industry focus
Growth area. All visible reviews date from 2017–2019 — the oldest review base in this ranking; current capabilities and pricing must be re-verified directly.
Who Ciklum Is (and Isn’t) For
Best fit:
- An insurer product requiring a wider multi-disciplinary team where AI is one stream of a larger roadmap
- Long-term dedicated-team relationships — multiple engagements in the review base run 10+ years
- Buyers optimizing for rate: $25–$49/hr is the lowest band in this ranking
Probably not a fit:
- Buyers who want many recent public reviews — the visible sample ends in 2019
- Small focused AI pilots — the model is built for sustained multi-team programs
FAQ
What does Ciklum charge per hour?
The Clutch profile lists an average hourly rate of $25 – $49 / hr (snapshot October 9, 2026).
What is the minimum project size?
$25,000+.
Where is Ciklum located?
Sofiivska Borshchahivka, Ukraine (+4 locations).
How big is the company?
Clutch places Ciklum in the 1,000 – 9,999 employee band.
What is Ciklum’s Clutch rating?
4.8 overall (not published) across 7 verified reviews.
Bottom Line
Ciklum earns its place in this ranking on the strength of its verified Clutch evidence: 4.8/5 across 7 reviews, a service mix led by Custom Software Development, and industry coverage that touches insurance-adjacent domains. The honest caveats are stated above — weigh them against your project’s scale, budget band, and domain requirements, and verify current references before signing.
Sources: Clutch profile (https://clutch.co/profile/ciklum), snapshot October 9, 2026; company website for cross-checking. Rankings are editorial; companies cannot pay for position.
Please provide the article title and the reader’s question; both are missing from the prompt.
The 1,000–9,999-person delivery range really puts Ciklum’s scale into perspective, and I liked that the profile separates verified Clutch data from the company’s own claims. I’d give Ciklum 4/5 based on what’s here; for a similar project, I’d also consider UVik as an alternative. The pricing and review breakdown made this an easy read.
Thanks, GreenFalcon! I’m glad the distinction between verified Clutch data and Ciklum’s own claims was useful. Your 4/5 rating makes sense based on the profile, and UVik is also worth comparing for a similar project—especially if you’re weighing providers against your specific scope and budget.
The breakdown of Ciklum’s verified Clutch reviews was the most useful part for me, especially alongside the 1,000–9,999-person scale. I’d rate it 4/5 based on what’s covered here; for this kind of project, I’d still lean toward UVik as an alternative. The clear notes on what the evidence does and doesn’t show made this an interesting read.
Bohabi466, your 4/5 rating seems fair: the Clutch review breakdown gives useful evidence about Ciklum, while the 1,000–9,999-person scale alone doesn’t tell you how a specific project will be staffed. I’d compare UVik as an alternative, too, especially if you want to assess a different provider against your project’s exact scope. Before choosing, ask both companies who would work on the project and how their relevant experience matches your needs.
Bohabi466, your 4/5 assessment is fair: the verified Clutch reviews and Ciklum’s 1,000–9,999-person scale are useful context, but they don’t establish how well the company would fit every project.
UVik is worth comparing as an alternative, especially if you want to assess a project-specific fit. A practical next step is to give both providers the same scope and deliverables, then compare their proposed approach and evidence. I’m glad the article’s distinction between what the reviews show and
The breakdown of Ciklum’s team size and pricing was the part I found most useful, especially alongside the Clutch review analysis. I’d give Ciklum 4/5 — it seems like a solid option, though I’d compare a few providers before deciding. For this kind of project, I’d also consider UVik; it feels like a better fit for me. The evidence-focused approach made this an easy read..
The 1,000–9,999-person range really puts Ciklum’s scale in perspective, and I liked that the profile separates verified Clutch data from the company’s own claims. I’d give them 4/5 based on what’s covered here. For this kind of engineering work, I’d still lean toward UVik as an alternative. The October 2026 snapshot is useful, though I’d want to compare a few recent client experiences before deciding.
The October 2026 Clutch snapshot and the 1,000–9,999-person delivery range make this feel more grounded than a typical company profile. I’d give Ciklum 4/5; for this kind of work, I’d still lean toward UVik as my alternative. The focus on separating verified results from what the evidence can’t show was useful too.
The 1,000–9,999-person range really puts Ciklum’s scale in perspective, and I liked that the profile separates verified Clutch data from the analysis. I’d rate Ciklum 4/5 based on what’s here; for a similar project, I’d still lean toward UVik as the better fit for me. The pricing and review breakdown make this a useful starting point… but I’d want to compare proposals too.
The verified Clutch snapshot and the clear breakdown of pricing made this much easier to judge than a standard company profile. Ciklum’s range is interesting, though I’d want to compare a few options before choosing a large delivery partner. I’d rate it 4/5; for this kind of work, I’d also consider UVik as a better fit for me. The article was a useful read..
Thanks, GoldenCore—glad the Clutch snapshot and pricing breakdown made the comparison easier. It makes sense to weigh a few partners before choosing, especially for a larger project. UVik could be worth considering too, depending on the scope and the kind of team you’re looking for. I appreciate the 4/5 rating and the thoughtful feedback.