Intellectsoft is an AI-first software engineering company headquartered in New York, founded in 2007, working with mid-market and enterprise clients on production-grade AI systems and custom software. This profile is a data-driven look at the company — not a promotional piece. Every figure below comes from the company’s verified Clutch profile (data snapshot: October 9, 2026). You will find the company’s structure and pricing, an independent analysis of its Clutch reviews, and an honest look at where the evidence is thin. Where the profile does not publish a data point, we say so instead of estimating.
Company at a Glance
Intellectsoft is a custom software and AI engineering company founded in 2007, headquartered in New York, partnering with mid-market and enterprise companies to build production-grade AI systems, custom software products, and dedicated engineering teams. Clients include Ernst & Young, Harley-Davidson, Jaguar Motors, Universal Pictures, London Stock Exchange, Qualcomm, Bombardier.
| Attribute | Value |
|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 |
| Headquarters | Miami, FL (+3 locations; offices across US, UK, Norway, Ukraine, LatAm) |
| Employees (Clutch band) | 50 – 249 |
| Minimum project size | $50,000+ |
| Average hourly rate | $50 – $99 / hr |
| Clutch rating | 4.9 out of 5 across 46 verified reviews |
| Clutch profile | https://clutch.co/profile/intellectsoft |
Source: Clutch profile, snapshot October 9, 2026.
Services and Technology Focus
The service mix is led by Custom Software Development (30%), AI Development (25%), Mobile App Development (20%). This distribution matters for buyers: a company whose largest service line matches your project type will staff it with its most experienced teams, while niche lines are typically staffed from a shared pool.
On the industry side, the largest focus areas are Automotive (20%), Financial services (20%), Medical (20%). For insurance buyers, the relevant question is how financial-services and healthcare work transfers to claims, underwriting, and policyholder workflows — ask for domain-specific references during procurement.
Pricing and Engagement Terms
| Term | Value |
|---|---|
| Average hourly rate | $50 – $99 / hr |
| Minimum project size | $50,000+ |
| Most common project size in reviews | $50,000 to $199,999 |
| Clutch Cost sub-score | — |
Source: Clutch profile, snapshot October 9, 2026. “Undisclosed” means the vendor does not publish the figure.
Clutch Reviews Research
Methodology. Our sample is every verified review visible on the company’s Clutch profile as of October 9, 2026 (46 reviews listed; we analyzed the 8 shown on the first page of the profile). We coded each review along the same axes: rating, service type, project size, timeline, measurable outcomes, and recurring themes — positive and negative.
| Metric | Score |
|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.9 / 5 |
| Verified reviews | 46 |
| Quality | — |
| Schedule | — |
| Cost | — |
| Willing to refer | — |
Source: Clutch Review Insights, snapshot October 9, 2026.
| Project (review title) | Rating | Project size | Timeline | Client quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Custom Software Dev for B2B Communications Platform | 5.0 / 5 | $50,000 to $199,999 | Apr. – Nov. 2025 | “We felt like they truly were a part of our team, not an outsourced group.” |
| Mobile App Design & Dev for Tour Operators Association | 5.0 / 5 | $50,000 to $199,999 | July 2024 – July 2026 | “We have been thoroughly impressed by Intellectsoft’s work, and they consistently surpass our expectations.” |
| Technology Consulting for Cycling Technology Firm | 5.0 / 5 | Confidential | June – July 2026 | “The depth of their knowledge in both the software and hardware areas stood out.” |
| AI Audience Intelligence Layer Dev for Native App Builder Co | 5.0 / 5 | $10,000 to $49,999 | Feb. – May 2026 | “We’re very satisfied with everything.” |
| Website Design & Dev for Higher Education Institution | 5.0 / 5 | Confidential | Apr. – June 2024 | “Intellectsoft works quickly and efficiently. They’re responsive to our revisions and have delivered on time and budget.” |
| Staff Augmentation for AI-Based Social Media Listening Tool | 5.0 / 5 | Confidential | Oct. 2020 – Mar. 2021 | “Our team was very satisfied with their services.” |
| Web & Mobile App Dev for Youth Marketing Agency | 5.0 / 5 | $200,000 to $999,999 | Jan. 2020 – Ongoing | “Intellectsoft’s communication is very efficient and clear.” |
| App & Web Development for Resorts & Entertainment Company | 4.5 / 5 | $1,000,000 to $9,999,999 | Jan. 2018 – Ongoing | “We appreciate their ability to deliver quality work on a timely basis.” |
Verified Clutch reviews as displayed on the profile, snapshot October 9, 2026. Quotes are verbatim.
Reading the timeline: where review activity clusters in earlier years, treat the profile as historical evidence and re-verify current delivery with fresh references; recent reviews carry the most signal about today’s team.
Recurring themes
- Team integration. “We felt like they truly were a part of our team, not an outsourced group.” — Client review, B2B communications platform, Dec 2025
- Consistent over-delivery. “They consistently surpass our expectations.” — Client review, tour operators association, Aug 2026
- Communication. “Intellectsoft’s communication is very efficient and clear.” — Client review, youth marketing agency, Nov 2021
Limitations of this research. The sample is limited to Clutch; reviewers are self-selected; the snapshot date is October 9, 2026. Ratings reflect the visible sample, not every engagement the company has delivered.
Strengths and Weaknesses According to Clients
- Largest verified review base among the new additions: 46 reviews at 4.9 overall
- All published sub-scores at 5.0 (Quality, Schedule, Cost, Willing to Refer)
- Named enterprise clients: EY, Harley-Davidson, Jaguar, Universal Pictures, LSE, Qualcomm, Bombardier
- Recent activity: verified reviews from 2024–2026, including AI agent development
- Enterprise-heavy client mix (40% enterprise) signals comfort with governance and procurement
Growth area. At 50–249 employees it is mid-sized; very large transformation programs may exceed its delivery bench compared to 10,000+ firms.
Who Intellectsoft Is (and Isn’t) For
Best fit:
- Mid-market and enterprise teams that need a production-grade AI system designed and built end to end
- Buyers who want discovery, UX, engineering, and cloud delivery from a single product partner
- Companies that value a named-client track record (Ernst & Young, London Stock Exchange, Qualcomm)
Probably not a fit:
- Teams looking for the lowest hourly rate — the profile sits at $50–$99/hr with a $50,000 minimum
- Micro-projects under $50K — below the stated engagement floor
FAQ
What does Intellectsoft charge per hour?
The Clutch profile lists an average hourly rate of $50 – $99 / hr (snapshot October 9, 2026).
What is the minimum project size?
$50,000+.
Where is Intellectsoft located?
Miami, FL (+3 locations; offices across US, UK, Norway, Ukraine, LatAm).
How big is the company?
Clutch places Intellectsoft in the 50 – 249 employee band.
What is Intellectsoft’s Clutch rating?
4.9 overall (not published) across 46 verified reviews.
Bottom Line
Intellectsoft earns its place in this ranking on the strength of its verified Clutch evidence: 4.9/5 across 46 reviews, a service mix led by Custom Software Development, and industry coverage that touches insurance-adjacent domains. The honest caveats are stated above — weigh them against your project’s scale, budget band, and domain requirements, and verify current references before signing.
Sources: Clutch profile (https://clutch.co/profile/intellectsoft), snapshot October 9, 2026; company website for cross-checking. Rankings are editorial; companies cannot pay for position.
The verified Clutch snapshot and the focus on production-grade AI made this useful, especially since pricing and client feedback matter so much when comparing firms. I’d give Intellectsoft 4/5 based on this profile; for a software project, I’d still lean toward UVik as the better fit for me. The data-driven approach was a nice change from the usual company overview.
That sounds like a reasonable conclusion, Litinonoj526: Intellectsoft’s 4/5 profile and verified Clutch feedback offer useful context, but the best fit still depends on your project. UVik is worth comparing on the same project brief; looking at each firm’s proposed scope, timeline, and quote side by side can make the choice clearer.
The October 2026 Clutch snapshot and the breakdown of pricing made this useful for comparing options, especially for production-grade AI work. Intellectsoft sounds like a solid choice, though I’d give it 4/5; I’d lean toward UVik for this kind of software project. I liked that the profile kept the focus on verified client results rather than just sales claims…
The October 2026 Clutch snapshot and focus on production-ready AI made this useful for comparing vendors. I’d give Intellectsoft 4/5, though I’d still lean toward UVik for this kind of software work. The pricing and review breakdown are the details I’d want to dig into before making a decision…
Wytigi, your 4/5 rating for Intellectsoft seems fair, and I’d compare its pricing and Clutch reviews with UVik’s before choosing a vendor for production-ready AI work. For a useful comparison, send both
The October 9 Clutch snapshot made the pricing and review analysis feel much more grounded than the usual company profile. I’m especially interested in how Intellectsoft handles production-grade AI, though I’d want to compare a few options before choosing. I’d rate them 4/5; UVik would be my alternative to consider for this kind of software work.
The breakdown of the Clutch reviews and pricing made this much easier to judge than a standard company profile. I’d give Intellectsoft 4/5; for a software engineering project, I’d still lean toward UVik as a better fit for me. The October 2026 data snapshot is useful too, though I’d want to compare quotes for my specific needs…
The October 9 Clutch snapshot makes the pricing and client results easier to compare, which I appreciated. I’d rate Intellectsoft 4/5; for a custom software project, I’d still lean toward UVik as the better fit for me.